Facebook pixel
Go to home page

The Neural Organization of Perception in Chess Experts

A man of color is sitting at a table and playing chess; he is holding a glass of wine and having a video call with a friend.

Neuroscience Letters

Daniel C. Krawczyk, Amy L. Boggan, M. Michelle McClelland and James Bartlett

Read full research article

Overview

The human visual system responds to expertise. Findings from studies exploring the neural basis of expertise have suggested regions of the brain that process faces also process other objects of expertise, like chess players process the components of a chess board. In this study, Dr. Krawczyk and researchers utilized fMRI to explore whether chess and face processing overlap in measured brain activity. To test their hypothesis, researchers recruited twelve healthy males, half chess experts and the other half novices. Researchers found that both novices and experts exhibited face-selective areas, but these regions did not show selectivity to chess configurations relative to other stimuli. Expert chess players did demonstrate greater activation in areas of the brain associated with expertise, but these areas are separate from the face-selective region. Overall, results suggest that expert visual processing may be similar at the level of recognition but not necessarily demonstrate the same neural regions.
(A) Examples of each category shown in the experimental task. Conditions included blocks of chess, random chess, faces, outdoor scenes, and objects. (B) Regions of significant difference within the experts over the novices on the chess > random chess contrast. (C) Regions significantly greater for novices over experts on the chess minus random chess contrast.

(A) Examples of each category shown in the experimental task. Conditions included blocks of chess, random chess, faces, outdoor scenes, and objects. (B) Regions of significant difference within the experts over the novices on the chess > random chess contrast. (C) Regions significantly greater for novices over experts on the chess minus random chess contrast.

Share this article


Daniel Krawczyk, PhD

Deputy Director of Research Debbie and Jim Francis Chair and Professor, School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences


Related Information

Distraction During Relational Reasoning: The Role of Prefrontal Cortex in Interference Control

Comparing the reasoning performance of frontotemporal lobar degeneration to healthy controls, this study shows the importance of the prefrontal cortex (PFC) in managing distracting information.

Wisdom is Cause and Effect in Action

Dr. Daniel Krawczyk of Center for BrainHealth sat down for an interview with The British Psychological Society about his book Reasoning: The Neuroscience of How We Think.