Facebook pixel
Go to home page
Go to home page

Left of Boom: Economics of Intervening After the Fact

Brainomics Bulletin Issue 3, February 2024.

Center for BrainHealth

Andrew S. Nevin

Left of Boom: Economics of Intervening After the Fact

Brainomics Issue 3Open Printable PDF
Consider 2 strategies for addressing brain health in the workplace:
  • Strategy 1: recognize we depend on the brain health of every employee, and everyone has a brain; teach our people how the brain functions and give every employee tools to assess and improve their own brain performance.
  • Strategy 2: Provide a number to call when something goes wrong with their brain (like depression) and hope that (a) the employee calls, and (b) the intervention is effective.
Well, we don’t need much analysis to know that Strategy 1 is almost certainly going to be more effective (and have higher economic returns) than Strategy 2 – any number of analogies can be cited, but the teeth comparison is simple: no one waits for a root canal to brush their teeth.Despite what we know, almost all companies are executing Strategy 2: an endless stream of emails saying if you have mental health challenges, call our EAP hotline. The results seem dismal – only 10% of employees with challenges call, only 2% of those get treatment, and only 51% of employees believe the service is confidential.The EAP strategy seems designed for failure.

“”

SCIENTIFIC PERSPECTIVE "The brain is the only irreplaceable major organ in our body. It’s time to keep it fit for a lifetime." – Sandra Bond Chapman, PhD, Chief Director of Center for BrainHealth
At the Center for BrainHealth, we have a different idea – Left of Boom. This military term means exactly what it says: it is better to do something before (i.e. to the left on the timeline) than right of Boom (after the explosion). Of course, after the Boom, you still have to intervene, but the fewer the Booms, the better of people and the economy will be.Email me to explore a BrainHealthy collaboration, at andrew.nevin@utdallas.edu.
Andrew S. Nevin signature.
Footnotes from infographic above:
  1. Spill Team. (2024, January 26). Understanding the ROI for your employee assistance program
  2. Onque, R. (2022, September 13). 49% of workers fear repercussions for being open about their mental health at work. CNBC
  3. Seabury, et al. (2019). Measuring the lifetime costs of serious mental illness and the mitigating effects of educational attainment. Health Affairs, 38(4), 652-659.
  4. Arnett, A.A. (2017, April 11). For every $1 spent on SEL, there's a, $11 return. Higher Ed Dive

Share this article

Andrew S. Nevin, PhD

Inaugural Director, Brainomics Venture Research Professor

Related Information

Why Left of Boom Is Critical: Building Resilience Now

Left of boom is a military term to prevent and protect from explosions, and to be proactive in decisions before they happen. Most people don’t think about their brains until something happens to it – boom! By strengthening the brain’s health and function before – getting "left of boom" – we give ourselves protection to mitigate, overcome or even avoid tough challenges that may lie ahead.

Brainomics Venture

We are taking a broader view of brain health, translating 30 years of science into economic impacts. When communities sustain brain health, it follows that there will be a larger economic benefit. Measuring and extending that benefit to drive improved organizational outcomes as well as policy initiatives is the focus of Brainomics™.

Business Models that Weaponize the Brain

How can we reverse the trend of business models privatizing gains while socializing losses? Awareness of the dangers these business models pose is growing. If we want people to thrive and want a strong economy, business models that harm our precious brain capital have to disappear.